SanctiFusion

Life, the Universe, and Everything, from the Outside In

A Question of Conscience

with 2 comments

About three fourths of the world’s Anglican bishops are meeting this week in Canterbury for a conflab. The main issue in the meeting is about conscience. The other fourth is boycotting the meeting as a matter of conscience.

Pretty big word, this. What is conscience? To some it is simply a feeling that can be manipulated, or claimed as a weakness with which to manipulate others, lest they “hurt one’s feelings.” This view seems to fit well with the “Modern” view that there is really no truth or knowledge beyond mere opinions. These bishops, though, as sworn servants of Christ, should be expected to think Christian-ly and follow a Christian meaning of that word.

In the New Testament we find serious warnings to respect the consciences of other Christians. Paul writes, “do not for the sake of your flesh destroy a person for whom Christ died.” He is there is talking there about respecting the consciences of others. Not that violating another’s Christian conscience is an insult or a matter of hurt feelings, but a mortal threat. The word here is not “insult” or, as some might suggest, “challenge,” but “destroy.” How is this? How is this?

In Hebrews we read about Christians’ consciences being cleansed of sin by the work of Christ’s Spirit in our lives, and of a resulting confidence before God. We read in Timothy about how some people will “depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron.” Each group is free from shame and guilt, but that is exactly where the resemblance ends. One is free from sin to know God, the others, well, just the opposite. For a Christian to cast away that confidence that comes from a cleansed conscience before God is the same as to defect from the Faith, and from Christ. For anyone, especially a leader in the Church of Christ, to reduce the question of “conscience” to a matter of personalities, is to declare themselves to be an enemy of the Gospel. Case closed.

Now who would want to be that foolhardy? As long as one has a conscience, there is hope. Let’s be praying for the consciences of the bishops in England this week!

Advertisements

Written by Robert Easter

Sunday, 20 July, 2008 at 9:50

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Now who would want to be that foolhardy? As long as one has a conscience, there is hope. Let’s be praying for the consciences of the bishops in England this week!

    Some culturally Christian religious leaders desire to radically secularise Christianity.

    Ultimately the religious philosophy and nature of these persons is outside of what God desires for his Kingdom via Scripture.

    thekingpin68

    Sunday, 27 July, 2008 at 9:18

  2. Yeah, it’s like trying to measure the volume of the ocean with a rectal thermometer. The flesh cannot fathom the things of the spirit, no matter how well they can quote Tillich, Barth, Oprah… Or even Sinatra. What is impossible with man (or woman) is not even a thing with God. He can even teach eejits like me!

    Robert

    Sunday, 27 July, 2008 at 22:06


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: